Michael Jackson - In Memoriam
I can’t say I was shocked when I heard that Michael Jackson had died suddenly. With his erratic behavior, frail constitution, and seemingly endless personal difficulties, it was hard to see how he was going to make it over the long haul. Anyway, could you picture the mercurial, surgically enhanced Peter Pan as an old man? God no. But while his end seemed perfectly in tune with his bizarre, troubled life, it was the tragedy of his story which really hit home for me.
There was something Shakespearean, or perhaps Nixonian, about the decline and fall of a man with such prodigious talents and instincts. We all know, or think we know, that something went wrong very early in this man’s life that drove him to extraordinary heights while ensuring his downfall; a Faustian bargain of which he was no party to. At least that’s what people will keep telling themselves, just to make sense out if it all. The puzzle pieces always need to fit together in our minds, but it’s wise, I think, to withhold judgment or declare any kind of conclusive summation to his story. We should have learned full well when O.J. hacked off his wife’s head that we simply do not and can not know these people, no matter how much we think we do. We are at a loss to explain the actions of our lovers and best friends at times, so how can we ever presume to write the final line in Michael’s tale.
For those of us who watched him at his heights, the tragedy is palpable; different from the tragedy of John Lennon’s assassination for white Americans such as myself, but still hitting close to home. I never really bought into the propaganda (which he helped push along) regarding the significance of his breaking down the barriers on whites-only MTV in 1983, staking a claim as an historical figure on par with Martin Luther King. Who gives a shit about the success of a network dedicated solely to broadcasting commercials for mostly shitty music? It’s lasting impact has been mostly negative, as we have seen. No, I suspect that Michael meant more to the African-Americans growing up when he did, seeing him with his brothers on all the tv shows singing ABC, watching the cartoons (as I did) and taking pride in a young man of such undeniably extraordinary talent. No matter how much a racist America would have liked to pigeonhole his abilities as a kind of modern singin’, dancin’ pickaninny (they all can do that can’t they?), Michael was clearly on a whole other level, winning everyone over and transcending callow categories. I’m sure deep in the heart of the community wronged by so much in this country’s history there was the prideful rejoinder, “take that whitey - let’s see you top this!”
For people like me, totally uninterested in dance music then as now, there was simply the appearance on Motown’s 25th anniversary of the newly minted Jackson, someone we tried to ignore as disco treacle after Off The Wall, strutting his way through Billy Jean with such gusto and grace that it made us wilt in admiration. Christ, here I was, a teenager obsessed with the Beatles and everything ‘60’s’, trying to moonwalk on the shag carpet in my rec room!
I now see his attempt to make himself something for everyone (man, woman, child, black, white, asian, he made himself a little bit of each), more cynically than I used to, but there is no denying that for a while there he pulled it off in grand style. The songs are still great and the moves are still unmatched. Before it became absurd and ridiculous, he was able to funnel the rage that must have boiled inside him into pure fire onstage, something his imitators (Usher, JT, etc.) are completely lacking. His eagerness to please must have been accompanied by a resentment of historic proportions that fueled his performances and at his best it froze us in our seats before it made us get up and dance.
The worldwide phenomenon he generated was trivial in its hugeness and it would be difficult to say that anything lasting and good really came out of it. He was the ultimate distraction and moneymaker in the age of distraction and money. But strip all that away and just listen to the songs and watch him go. Face it, he can still stop you in your tracks.
27 June, 2009 - 15:07 — Alan Shulman
Comments for Michael Jackson - In Memoriam
Alan, I feel the same way
Alan,
I feel the same way you do in regards to MJ and his legacy, though I failed to articulate it as well as you. This was a pleasure to read.
http://letters-from-a-tapehead.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jackson-1958...
Sean
Nice comments Sean. Yeah,
Nice comments Sean. Yeah, it occurred to me that a lot of people forgot how good he actually was. If I'm out at a club, its always a joy when "Don't Stop Til You Get Enough" comes on. It never gets old.
BTW, shout out to Lansdale. Can't recall if I mentioned it before but I'm a Philly native who went to Temple's Ambler campus my freshman year, which is not to far from you.
Small world. I actually
Small world. I actually grew up in Ambler and lived there up until a couple years ago when my wife and I bought a house in Lansdale. Ambler's experiencing a neighborhood renaissance of sorts, so it's actually kind of expensive to live there now. Never thought I'd live to see that happen.
MJ
Most of MJ post-J5 was treacle.
Look, he had a great blues and sould voice, but Off The Wall was a bad album, and one that may have hastened disco's demise, and Thriller basically mixed r&b and rock and pop into a bland mush.
The other black weirdo superstar from that era- Prince- let's face it, had it all over MJ as a musician and artist, and I'm no Prince fan.
But the hagiography is ridiculous. A) in 100 years no one will be listening to MJ the way they do Gershwin, Beethoven or Mozart. B) Even compared to other mega-pop stars- Elvis, Beatles, Led Zep, Dylan, Aretha, his oeuvre is decidedly 'lite.'
Great entertainer? Sure. Great artist? Please.
--
The Dan Schneider Interviews: The Most Widely
Read Interview Series in Internet History
www.Cosmoetica.com
Cosmoetica: The Best In Poetica
www.Cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
Cinemension: Film's Extra Dimension
I'm not sure how anyone who
I'm not sure how anyone who has actually seen this man perform, or heard a song like Billy Jean or Wanna Be Starting Something or Don't Stop til You Get Enough, can fail to miss a performing artist of the first rank. Sure, a lot of what he did was crap. A lot of what Elvis did was crap. But like Elvis, MJ could channel some kind of inner fire into pure magic. I'm not even a 'fan' by any standard and I don't own a single Jackson album, but when he was doing his thing, I, and many of the other human beings on this planet, could not look away. It was the same with Elvis. Call it the gift of the shaman or whatever, but select few people have that kind of ability. To make a comparison, Beyonce needs to strip down to her skivvies to hold that kind of attention. To call it mere entertainiment is to ignore its power and to miss the anger and pain in his best vocal performances.
MJ2
I'm not sure how anyone who has actually seen this man perform, or heard a song like Billy Jean or Wanna Be Starting Something or Don't Stop til You Get Enough, can fail to miss a performing artist of the first rank.
***I did say he was an entertainer, but that does not mean he's an artist. Again, do you realy think anyone will be listening to him en masse in 100 years? But, do you think there will be Gershwin and Mozart concerts? THAT's the diff. AS for the 3 songs- just look at the lyrics and listen to the musics. Are you telling me that those 3 songs are better than ABC or any of the top 10 or so J5 hits? This is what I mean when I say MJ made pop into a bland mush. Sly Stone, even Rick James, had what might loosely be called a 'vision' for their music. Did MJ? Is there a defining hallmark save for trite lyrics, insipid rhythms, and a desire to be PC?
Sure, a lot of what he did was crap. A lot of what Elvis did was crap. But like Elvis, MJ could channel some kind of inner fire into pure magic.
***Alan, I'm going to resist even commenting on the 'nner fire into pure magic' meme.
I'm not even a 'fan' by any standard and I don't own a single Jackson album, but when he was doing his thing, I, and many of the other human beings on this planet, could not look away. It was the same with Elvis. Call it the gift of the shaman or whatever, but select few people have that kind of ability. To make a comparison, Beyonce needs to strip down to her skivvies to hold that kind of attention.
***Again, that's entertainment and ephemeral. It was 12-15 years or more since he had a hit, and 20 since he had any relevance? Again, Prince is the logical comparison. And Prince is easily the better artist- by a mile, and I actually prefer MJ's early music to anything by Prince, but reality is reality. Prince was way more talented than MJ.
Also, did a single MJ song ever comment on something deeper than narcissism and his desire to be famous? We're not talking Billie Holliday here. Was he a great entertainer. Yeah, I'll give you that. So? So is Barry Manilow. So is Neil Diamond. And something tells me their stuff- for better or worse- will outlast Thriller or Off The Wall.
To call it mere entertainiment is to ignore its power and to miss the anger and pain in his best vocal performances.
***Call it what you will, but leave 'art' out of it. Unless you're willing to include Justin Timberlake, Britney, and Mariah as artists too, and I think you won't go there.
--
The Dan Schneider Interviews: The Most Widely
Read Interview Series in Internet History
www.Cosmoetica.com
Cosmoetica: The Best In Poetica
www.Cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
Cinemension: Film's Extra Dimension
Maybe we will agree to
Maybe we will agree to disagree, but I think its too easy to write off someone with that kind of charisma and talent as merely an entertainer. Was Louis Armstrong merely an entertainer? Of course not. He had a talent for the trumpet and for singing that transcended something as ephemeral as 'entertainment'. I still listen regularly to 'entertaining' recordings he made nearly a hundred years ago. And I must say that I believe strongly that people will still be listening to Billy Jean one hundred years from now. It is as powerful a piece of music as the 80s produced, with a palpable sense of excitement and desperation - real emotions that real artists are able to communicate. I would say that mere entertainers never infer anything below the surface, and that artists always do. You can laugh about my 'inner fire' comment but it boggles my mind how you can watch this man in his best performances, and not see it. You know, they laughed at Elvis too, until enough smart people looked back and realized that there was something there that doesn't come around every two weeks - that he wasn't just some dumb hick who could carry a tune. If Elvis was an artist, why wasn't Michael?
MJ and Louis
Louis was an artist- you can argue over his greatness. But, his music reached much more deply into the human condition- be it in his duets with Ella or numerous other folk, to his horn playing. I detest the jazz enthusiasts who get titillated over every record a Coltrane or Bird made, or even Louis, but, after you peel away the hype, there WAS something there- this is why much of their music makes great soundtracks to films for 6 decades plus.
Same w Gershwin or Beethoven. Same with Led Zep or The Beatles. But, what depths did any of the pop songs MJ did, mentioned here, could be used in such a way. MJ music was escapism- like Air Supply or the treacly power ballads of Journey, REO Speedwagon or hair bands of that same era. Let's face it, the 1980s were the worst decade in rock history, thus far- although this decade may yet challenge its lows!
Billie Jean desperate?- it's a song about the narcissistic pursuit of someone and/or the denial of responsibility. I.e.- it was the perfect sog for the Reagan 80s- but compare it to the lyrics of a Beatles or Doors song, or even classic Motown. No one's denying that if you grew up with this music you have no right to love it.
I love the Godzilla films of the 60s and 70s, BUT I don't confuse them with Kurosawa, nor do I think those films' director was Welles, or even Hitchcock!
'I would say that mere entertainers never infer anything below the surface, and that artists always do.'
I agree, and MJ never did- he was all sheen and no substance. Again, the likely reason he was so big in the 80s and got killed by Grunge. And his freakshow real life showed how vapid he was. He was a talent, but history will show what an utter waste he was. He could have been Marvin Gaye, Nat King Cole, Johnny Mathis and Elvis in one. Instead, he died a freak.
Finally, one last point re: Prince. For the last decade I've listened to pop and r&b stations while commuting. In this decade, it was VERY rare to ever hear MJ on the radio. But Prince's stuff- new and old- was played across the dial. Why? a) he was relevant (a slippery term, but undeniable vis-a-vis his continued presence), b) his music actually has influenced others. Let's be real- who do most rap stars today rip off more- MJ or Prince? C'mon.
As for Elvis, it's worth noting that in the 4-5 years before his death, he too was largely forgotten by the public in the post-Woodstock, disco age. Had he lived to be an old man, today he might be getting a lifetime achievement award on some lame awards show in front of an audience of rappers going, WFT? Whodat?
The real lesson, Dying was the best career move Elvis and his ex-son-in-law could ever make!
--
The Dan Schneider Interviews: The Most Widely
Read Interview Series in Internet History
www.Cosmoetica.com
Cosmoetica: The Best In Poetica
www.Cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
Cinemension: Film's Extra Dimension
Article reaction
I have to say I think article is bang on, Alan.
The point Dan makes about a lack of relevance for the last 20 years is an interesting one. While I have no desire whatsoever to listen to any of Jackson's 90s music, the enormous impact of his late 70s/early 80s work with Quincy Jones continues to be felt today in R&B, hip hop and pop music. The "insipid rhythms" of tracks like Billie Jean, Thriller, and Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough have been sampled by legions of artists (from bland pop performers to hip hop visionaries) since their release. Whatever your views on modern day pop, Jackson's influence cannot be disregarded.
I'd sooner listen to a Prince record, and yes I prefer a lot of the Jackson 5 songs to his solo stuff, but there are handful of songs from the Off the Wall and Thriller period that are simply landmark recordings in popular music.
Post new comment