Excuse me, was that a question?
Ok, some smart social anthropologist needs to get to the bottom of this whole, ending your spoken sentences or phrases with a rising intonation, making a simple statement sound like a question, thing. You know what I’m talking about. If you don’t, just download any podcast in which a group of educated American people under 30 talk to each other and your bound to hear it a thousand times. Here’s an example. Say the following statement of opinion and make sure to turn it into a question: “Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill has a kind of 70’s chop-suey film aesthetic that is meaningless outside of a context of omnipresent nostalgia?” I single out Americans because as far as I can tell this habit has only infected the US at present (I’d be curious if the Brits on the site disagree).
At first blush this may seem like just another rant where an older dude whines about how the young people keep changing his beautiful language by introducing innovations like ‘23 skidoo’, ‘daddy-o’ or ‘fa shizzle’. But this isn’t about words, it’s about the way they are spoken. From my research, I date the beginning of this phenomenon to sometime in the early grunge era, though I can’t really see a direct correlation between wearing flannel and speaking with all the confidence of a ten year old giving her first oral presentation in class. So where is this coming from? The only thing I can think of is that the age of non-stop ironic detachment, relativism and post modern meta-reality has finally taken its toll on the young, who no longer have the cojones to express a thought or an opinion without a hedge. Maybe I mean this, but maybe I don’t? Who’s to say what’s real? I can’t even be secure enough in my own feelings to express them with any definitiveness? Doncha think? Whatever it is, it’s annoying to the rest of us who don’t need external validation for anything we might say, so please stop. And if you need any further encouragement, just imagine your boyfriend taking you by the hand in the silver moonlight, looking directly into your eyes and saying, “I love you?”
. . .
Bruno
It looks like Bruno is not going to be the mega-hit that Borat turned out to be, and it’s no wonder. It’s probably not quite as funny, though that’s not the reason. In Borat, a large segment of the country could laugh at its ostensible targets, strange foreign people and xenophobes, because a healthy segment of the population was neither. In Bruno, Baron-Cohen again runs two extremes right into each other, except this time it's flamboyantly gay men and homophobes. Most straight people have no problem laughing at a preening, prancing man, but when the mirror is turned on their own fear of gay men, things get a little dicey. The explicit nature of the movie and its over-the-top frankness is just too much for too many people to take, keeping them away in droves. How many people are really prepared to walk into a movie which, in order for it to work, would make them question their prejudices and lifelong social conditioning? I have to say that several scenes made my sphincter tighten involuntarily, as if under threat. But if we don’t watch we miss Baron-Cohen’s satire, which is different in kind from almost anything most of us have ever seen. That’s because it is satire without a clear target, or perhaps with a rapidly moving one. Am I supposed to laugh at the crazy gay guy or the wary rednecks? Is he mocking the celebrity worshiper or the celebrities? I suspect the answer is all of the above. He seems to have found a method for making fun of everything. Even in the scene where Bruno takes his adopted African baby, who he calls O.J., onto the Richard Bey show and proceeds to tell the almost all-black audience how he traded the infant for an iPod, we laugh at the audience, despite their justifiable outrage. Why? Because what the hell are they doing on the Richard Bey show, lining up for a chance to vent their spleens on the latest carnival attraction dug up by daytime television? You see? No one is safe, we are all ridiculous, and I say, relax and enjoy it.

Comments (8)
But wasn't Borat exactly the
But wasn't Borat exactly the same? One of the things which made its charm was exactly the ambiguity of the jokes. Was he targeting the awkward foreigner? Or was he, in fact, calling out the xenophobes/racists/religious bigots/etc.?
Yeah, I think that's his
Yeah, I think that's his whole approach, which I think is very original. I think Bruno hits too close to home for a lot of people though, and its not going to be nearly as popular as Borat for that reason
Academia's shift towards
Academia's shift towards subjective inclusiveness and embrace of popular culture, among other factors, has created a generation unable to trust it's own instincts and experience to do something so minor and rightful as to confidently express an opinion without qualifying it into irrelevance?
The dissolution of arbitrary distinctions between high and low culture and imperialist elevation of the Anglo-European canon are great trends but tend to leave more insecure young intellectuals without a security blanket to validate their opinions?
The internet has also made the popular debate larger and more participatory than ever, ensuring that any opinion expressed, no matter how eloquently or persuasively, will attract several disagreements asserting the exact opposite and making it personal?
The statement as question trend is not exactly that great straw man "political correctness" but does betray a fear that any opinion, no matter how honestly come by, is vulnerable to being misconstrued as reflecting some abhorrent prejudice or blinding ignorance?
Hahaha?
Hahaha?
Also I'd just like to toss
Also I'd just like to toss in that the AV Club is my favoritest place on the interweb with a fascinating team of great, knowledgeable writers. While I love their podcasts, I realize that they do exactly what Alan is talking about all the time. They also obsessively qualify their experience or lack thereof even for the most trivial subjects. So you'll hear things like Tasha Robinson apologetically explaining before entering the discussion that she might not be the world's foremost expert or even an avowed fan of, say, the "Terminator" movies.
A Brit, like, interjects?
I always understood that the questioning tone at the end of a sentence was an Australian phenomenon, but it appears it's both an Australian and American characteristic (well, if you believe this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_rising_terminal)
Anyway, it's becoming more and more prevalent throughout the UK and it's incredibly irritating. I think it's due to kids growing up on a diet of imported TV and just picking up the speech patterns and cadences.
I watched a documentary last week about teen pregnancy (I know, cheery stuff) and the 15 year old girl with a kid seemed to be fairly mature. However, what she was saying was completely undermined by her tone, so she was saying, "I think I've really, like, matured? Since, like, being pregnant?"
Wow, thanks for that link.
Wow, thanks for that link. I had no idea there was an official name. Its a good thing I'm not an actual journalist who does, like, research and stuff? But it looks like Family Guy beat me to the punch. Figures. The next thing I need to figure out is why it bothers me so much.
Not as irritating as this, yeah?
Alan, I think you're absolutely right in saying this is a growing trend and like Joe, I agree that it's taking off in Britain. Unfortunately, there are bigger crimes against the English language taking place on our streets every day. For example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW7l8JyyMJw