Obsessions and Lamentations #15 - Dudes Hatin' on Chicks Edition
Sos I’m sittin’ around watchin’ the Super Bowl like any good patriot should and I’m wonderin’, is there some kind of crisis in male/female relations going on in this country? I knew that a lot of guys fear and resent women, hell, we used to burn them at the stake in Salem when they got a little out of control. But since when did they start flat-out hating them? Asking my girlfriend if she was surprised by the level of advanced sexism on display she rolled her eyes in that way that suggests the question, “what planet have you been living on these past 40 years?” Yeah, I know, the Super Bowl is always filled with ads appealing to men’s baser instincts of objectification and territoriality. Nothing new there. What seemed different this year was the palpable sense of white male privilege under threat. I see this as part of a larger strain in the culture that started with the birthers and morphed into the Tea Party movement, with Sarah Palin its new Messiah (“I will live, I will die for the people of America”). It is a strain towards tribalism, which even a cursory reading of history tells us is never a good thing.
How can I make such an outlandish claim on the basis of some moronic Super Bowl ads? Check out the Snickers commercial, which tells us that it sucks to be an old woman (or Abe Vigoda, let’s just say someone living off the government teet on Medicare and Social Security. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3rsaneyeXY ) and it’s cool to be a white guy playing football. Why do I suspect that a couple years ago, there would have been a token black or asian man on that team, in the interest of diversity? But that wouldn’t work because black guys on welfare are getting your tax money too, aren’t they? Then there was the serial killer-like repressed rage and misogyny of the Dodge Charger commercial (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RyPamyWotM ). It was as if the men in the ad were saying “Sure, I’ll put the seat down, but first I’m going to buy this fucking truck and run you over with it.” For chrissakes, even the E-Trade babies are whining about the bitches in their lives. And let’s throw in a bash at the “brainiacs” who sit around reading “books” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgZ-8hNY0go ). Of course, in this universe just vaguely attractive women, worthy only of the chilled out white dude’s pick up lines and thinly veiled contempt, bother to waste time reading and, god forbid, talking about what they read. And then there was the nauseating Docker’s ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiS-2sTFdZ0) that told the nearly all-white crowd of singing guys it was time to “wear the pants”, which is code for “grow a pair and put your woman in her place.” This was complemented by an astoundingly sexist rant posted on their website called a “Man-ifesto”, which tells us that in the past “men took charge because that’s what they did” and when the “world decided it no longer needed men”, they were “left stranded on the road between boyhood and androgyny.” I’m not making any of this up. Women’s groups were thrown a feint when they were told that Focus on the Family would be running an anti-abortion ad with Tim Tebow. All that told us was that Tim’s mom thinks he’s swell and, reading between the lines, she’s glad she didn’t abort him in utero. I guess we can all agree on that. They must have been looking the other way when corporate America threw them a solid right to the solar plexus.
I know times are bad, and white guys are losing jobs at a relatively healthy clip. African-American unemployment is, as usual, much worse, but that’s beside the point. I think what these ads were telling us, if we didn’t already know, was that white guys are angry. They want you to give them their country back and while you’re at it throw in their balls for good measure. Things had gotten so bad under Bush that it made the possibility of electing an African-American President possible, but that very same state of affairs has emboldened the most tribal strains in our reptilian brains. Where will it all lead? I’m getting ahead of the curve and pitching an ad to Bud Light for next year’s Super Bowl. Open on a young couple in their kitchen, regular guy in t-shirt and jeans, attractive woman, well groomed and mildly enticing. The man opens the refrigerator and looks inside, and while he does, the woman pulls out the last remaining Bud Light. The man stares blankly at the woman, then hauls off and punches her square in the jaw. She goes down hard and he picks up the bottle, sticks the top in her mouth and opens it with her bloody teeth. Man smiles and goes back to living room to watch the game.
8 February, 2010 - 20:31 — Alan Shulman
Comments for Obsessions and Lamentations #15 - Dudes Hatin' on Chicks Edition
Very much enjoyed this, Alan.
Very much enjoyed this, Alan.
Thanks
Thanks sir. Am I crazy or was it especially bad this year?
To tell you the truth, I
To tell you the truth, I ignored the Super Bowl this year so I didn't see the commercials. But, you were not alone in your assessment. My wife read a few articles online that made similar claims regarding the roles of women as emasculating tyrants that don't like fun.
It works both ways
In the UK (and, presumably, worldwide) there are plenty of ads that portray women as fun-loving, pack-animals who can only rely on each other because - get this, fellas - men are so hopeless! Look at them with their silly manly ways as they struggle to put up shelves and generally muddle their way through the modern world. Bonus points are awarded for these adverts if they are accompanied by the sound of "Here Come the Girls".
I think advertisers that want to appeal to one sex more than the other just go for the obvious stereotypes and end up being pretty offensive to the other. My guess would be that because it was the Superbowl, the adverts would target men primarily, but if you were to take a show like Grey's Anatomy (now who's stereotyping?), you'd get the ads for women.
Obviously I didn't watch the Superbowl being from the UK and all [insert long rant about definition of "football"]
Oh, and great article by the way. Very much enjoyed it.
Though I'm inclined to agree.
Though I'm inclined to agree with the notion that it does go both ways here in the UK, the article seems to be saying the Superbowl went to an extreme (and by the sounds of it, it really did). We've got the 'here come the girls', but we've also got things like Yorkie and Coke Zero adverts which advertise specifically for men. I haven't watched American television, but from the author's descriptions I gather the kinds of adverts they were showing would have caused absolute uproar over here. Adverts that are sexist in the UK tend to have a tongue firmly in cheek, or alternatively, are aimed at empowering women/men but not at the expense of the other.
Post new comment